I’m sure you’ve all heard the concept of reducing your possessions to 100 things. Why 100? [and then returned to my normal ways with a nice check from the publisher to boot]? Maybe because it makes a great title for a “How I Did X in a Year” book or blog project.
.
😉 [instead of 2 and 5]
Life would be much easier if humans had 8 fingers instead, because that would make round numbers more easily expressed in powers of 2, 4, or 8.
. Also, there will be more of them. In any case…
- This may all be well and well. Admittedly, there is a cult of simplicity and I love simplicity insofar as it makes many of my goals, which revolve primarily around the concept of independence, much easier to achieve; However, in many cases, there also seems to be a kind of one-upmanship as people try to prove that their “faith” is definitely stronger than others.
- In practice, the number 100 is only useful for inventorying your possessions. However, there’s really no indication of this unless you’re writing about your project. From a practical standpoint, it is very important to take this into account
- How much volume does your stuff take up?
How much does it weigh?
How much do you use it?
Size usually determines your storage limitations and extends your transportation limitations to some extent. There’s a theory that homes have become huge – a word perhaps derived from stupid, I think – large because of the need to protect all the waste we haul home from department stores. Shelter is really expensive, especially if you want it in residential areas and want to keep your belongings heated or cooled at the same temperature as you keep them yourself.
Weight is an issue if you carry it. It’s also an issue if you live on a boat or in an RV. We live in an RV, but we don’t have slides. This means we can carry a few tons per person. If we had external slides, our weight constraint would be surprisingly small (after deducting the water suits (white, gray and black): perhaps a few hundred pounds each (including the weight of the person!). A recent invention (and therefore not a sturdy construction) intended To convey the feeling of space for a short vacation at the lowest possible price, by reducing freight allowances, the RV can carry slide slides instead without increasing the size of the motor or bulk. The frame also applies to wide-beam boats with large space, but it is not as safe as Deep crossbar.
Utilization is the primary concern of a financially sound ship. This is included in your personal return on assets, so to speak. How much did you pay that you don’t use? In terms of saving and spending, both economically and environmentally, if you have 101 items (and as a result, you’re definitely on your way to the simple version of hell, which presumably involves having pictures hanging on the wall or piles of papers strewn about your house). Office) It doesn’t matter if it’s used regularly, doesn’t take up a lot of space, and doesn’t weigh a ton
.
Weight is actually a good indicator of environmental impact as well. With some exceptions (such as laptops and hybrid cars due to the effect being transferred to a high-tech factory) the more it weighs, the more resources are needed to make it, and the worse it gets. In addition, 100 items is a fixed number. Let’s say you have 100 items of clothing and your pair of pants (or is that two items?!) wears out. Then you go and buy another pair. You have now used 101 items. If you keep your list short by simply rotating things in and out, does it really matter, simply because you haven’t bought them yet? From a purely “religious” point of view, it is important because it does not contradict the rules of simplification. It challenges other points though. For example, I could get rid of all my cookware and start eating out. This would cut down on the number of things, but would it be a net benefit to my “business” of outsourcing all my assets this way? For some reason, I don’t think so, other than to hold on to some faith. Now it may seem that I am attacking this challenge. I am somewhat. However, most of the time, it’s probably more good than bad because it forces people to take a closer look at what they really need. It also reduces shelter needs and makes transportation easier as long as one of the items on the 100 list isn’t a swimming pool or a tractor. What I attack is the idea of putting a number on it and sensationalizing it. That’s just nuts. More from Yakizi:
Which is more: $500,000 or $2,000,000
@ Your Money Engineer &
Cut the fat – lose the things you don’t need
@Frugal Zeitgeist. These posts were selected as the best post of the month by the bloggers who submitted them, so check them out if you’re looking to add more blogs to your reading list.
Copyright © 2007-2023 Earlyretirementextreme.comThis feed is intended for personal, non-commercial use only. Use of this feed on other sites violates copyright. If you see this notice anywhere other than your news reader, it makes the page you’re viewing infringing copyright. Some sites use random word replacement algorithms to hide the origin. Find the original, undamaged copy of this publication at earlyretirementextreme.com. (Digital imprint: 47d7050e5790442c7fa8cab55461e9ce)Originally published on 2010-03-04 09:11:58.
Source link
